Subtitles section Play video
-
Hello and welcome to 6 Minute
-
English. I'm Neil.
-
And I'm Catherine.
-
Catherine, are you tall enough?
-
Tall enough for what?
-
Tall enough to be happy with your height.
-
Er, well, yes, I'm alright with
-
my height, I can't do a thing about it
-
anyway so, how about you?
-
Well, the same, really. I wouldn't
-
mind being slightly taller, I suppose, which
-
is appropriate as today's
-
topic is about heightism.
-
Heightism. Now, you may not
-
have heard of heightism before, but it's
-
like other 'isms' - like racism, sexism,
-
ageism and other 'isms' that highlight a
-
particular kind of
-
discrimination or unequal treatment that
-
people experience.
-
But before we find out more about
-
this topic, our quiz question for today.
-
The tallest person ever proven to live was
-
Robert Wadlow from the USA. How tall
-
was he? Was he: a) 2.71m; b) 2.72m or
-
c) 2.73m? What do you think, Catherine?
-
Wow, that's really, really tall!
-
I'm going to guess 2.71m.
-
Well, listen out for the answer at the
-
end of the programme. Tanya S Osensky
-
is an attorney and author of the book
-
'Shortchanged' about her own
-
experiences of heightism.
-
Clever title. To short-change
-
someone is to not give them what they
-
are entitled to, what they deserve.
-
And originally this phrase comes from
-
paying for something and
-
not getting the right money back. So if I
-
buy something for £6 and I pay with a £10
-
note and the shopkeeper only gives me
-
£3 back, I've been short-changed - it
-
means I've been cheated. And in the
-
context of facing discrimination because
-
you're not tall, 'Shortchanged'
-
is a really good pun.
-
Tanya spoke about her book on the
-
BBC radio programme Thinking Allowed.
-
She talks first about our general
-
feelings about height. What does she say
-
people never wish for?
-
Everybody that I've
-
spoken to who is tall relishes their height.
-
I have not met anybody who said they
-
would wish they were shorter and people
-
generally tend to even embellish what
-
their height is when you
-
ask them what it is.
-
So what is it she says
-
no one wishes for?
-
Well, she says no one wishes
-
they were shorter!
-
And that's right. She said that tall
-
people relish their height. This means
-
they enjoy being tall, they get
-
great satisfaction from it.
-
And another point she makes
-
is that many people embellish their
-
height, if asked. This means they say
-
they are taller than they actually are. Now,
-
to embellish a fact means to
-
exaggerate it to make it seem
-
bigger, faster, better and so on.
-
Here's Tanya S Osensky again.
-
Everybody that I've
-
spoken to who is tall relishes their height.
-
I have not met anybody who said
-
they would wish they were shorter and
-
people generally tend to even embellish
-
what their height is when you
-
ask them what it is.
-
She goes on to explain how some
-
research has shown that shorter people
-
are less likely to get jobs, less likely to get
-
promoted and less likely to earn as much
-
as taller people. What is the financial
-
difference she mentions? She talks about
-
the premium per inch. An inch is about
-
2.5cm and the premium is a word which
-
means the extra benefit,
-
the extra advantage.
-
Here's Tanya S Osensky again.
-
One set of data showed
-
that the premium for height is over $2000
-
per inch for men and $1000 per inch
-
for women and over time that disparity
-
grows significantly so it ends up being
-
a huge chunk of someone's
-
paycheck over their career.
-
She says that taller men earn
-
$2000 an inch.
-
For women it's a bit less, but still
-
significant at $1000 an inch.
-
And this disparity - or
-
difference - between the salaries of taller
-
and shorter people, is an example
-
of heightism. Shorter people, she says,
-
are getting fewer jobs and
-
fewer benefits because they are short.
-
Well, one person who certainly
-
wasn't short was the subject of today's
-
quiz question. The tallest person who
-
has lived, Robert Wadlow. We asked how
-
tall he was, was it: a) 2.71m;
-
b) 2.72m or c) 2.73m?
-
What did you say, Catherine?
-
I said 2.71m.
-
Well, you were almost there. The
-
correct answer was b) 2.72m.
-
Congratulations if you got that right.
-
Now Catherine, much as I relish
-
being in the studio with you, we must
-
wrap up the programme now with
-
a review of today's vocabulary.
-
Well, relish was one of those
-
words. If you relish something you really
-
enjoy it - so thanks you for that, Neil.
-
You're welcome! This programme
-
was about a kind of discrimination.
-
This means the unfair or unequal
-
treatment of people because of,
-
for example, their race, religion, colour,
-
age or indeed height.
-
And discrimination because of
-
someone's height is called heightism.
-
Something which many of us do is
-
embellish our height - we say we are taller
-
than we actually are.
-
A premium is an extra benefit
-
or advantage that can be gained, in this
-
case, by being taller. And finally
-
we had disparity, another word for
-
difference. There is a disparity
-
between salaries of tall people and
-
their shorter colleagues.
-
And that is 6 Minute English for
-
today. Do join us again and until then we
-
look forward to seeing you in all the
-
usual places: Instagram, Facebook,
-
Twitter, YouTube as well as our
-
website, bbclearningenglish.com.
-
Goodbye.
-
Bye!