Subtitles section Play video
-
I'm going to talk today
-
about the pleasures of everyday life.
-
But I want to begin with a story
-
of an unusual and terrible man.
-
This is Hermann Goering.
-
Goering was Hitler's second in command in World War II,
-
his designated successor.
-
And like Hitler,
-
Goering fancied himself a collector of art.
-
He went through Europe, through World War II,
-
stealing, extorting and occasionally buying
-
various paintings for his collection.
-
And what he really wanted was something by Vermeer.
-
Hitler had two of them, and he didn't have any.
-
So he finally found an art dealer,
-
a Dutch art dealer named Han van Meegeren,
-
who sold him a wonderful Vermeer
-
for the cost of what would now be 10 million dollars.
-
And it was his favorite artwork ever.
-
World War II came to an end,
-
and Goering was captured, tried at Nuremberg
-
and ultimately sentenced to death.
-
Then the Allied forces went through his collections
-
and found the paintings
-
and went after the people who sold it to him.
-
And at some point the Dutch police came into Amsterdam
-
and arrested Van Meegeren.
-
Van Meegeren was charged with the crime of treason,
-
which is itself punishable by death.
-
Six weeks into his prison sentence,
-
van Meegeren confessed.
-
But he didn't confess to treason.
-
He said, "I did not sell a great masterpiece
-
to that Nazi.
-
I painted it myself; I'm a forger."
-
Now nobody believed him.
-
And he said, "I'll prove it.
-
Bring me a canvas and some paint,
-
and I will paint a Vermeer much better
-
than I sold that disgusting Nazi.
-
I also need alcohol and morphine, because it's the only way I can work."
-
(Laughter)
-
So they brought him in.
-
He painted a beautiful Vermeer.
-
And then the charges of treason were dropped.
-
He had a lesser charge of forgery,
-
got a year sentence
-
and died a hero to the Dutch people.
-
There's a lot more to be said about van Meegeren,
-
but I want to turn now to Goering,
-
who's pictured here being interrogated at Nuremberg.
-
Now Goering was, by all accounts, a terrible man.
-
Even for a Nazi, he was a terrible man.
-
His American interrogators described him
-
as an amicable psychopath.
-
But you could feel sympathy
-
for the reaction he had
-
when he was told that his favorite painting
-
was actually a forgery.
-
According to his biographer,
-
"He looked as if for the first time
-
he had discovered there was evil in the world."
-
(Laughter)
-
And he killed himself soon afterwards.
-
He had discovered after all
-
that the painting he thought was this
-
was actually that.
-
It looked the same,
-
but it had a different origin, it was a different artwork.
-
It wasn't just him who was in for a shock.
-
Once van Meegeren was on trial, he couldn't stop talking.
-
And he boasted about all the great masterpieces
-
that he himself had painted
-
that were attributed to other artists.
-
In particular, "The Supper at Emmaus"
-
which was viewed as Vermeer's finest masterpiece, his best work --
-
people would come [from] all over the world to see it --
-
was actually a forgery.
-
It was not that painting, but that painting.
-
And when that was discovered,
-
it lost all its value and was taken away from the museum.
-
Why does this matter?
-
I'm a psychologists -- why do origins matter so much?
-
Why do we respond so much
-
to our knowledge of where something comes from?
-
Well there's an answer that many people would give.
-
Many sociologists like Veblen and Wolfe
-
would argue that the reason why we take origins so seriously
-
is because we're snobs, because we're focused on status.
-
Among other things,
-
if you want to show off how rich you are, how powerful you are,
-
it's always better to own an original than a forgery
-
because there's always going to be fewer originals than forgeries.
-
I don't doubt that that plays some role,
-
but what I want to convince you of today
-
is that there's something else going on.
-
I want to convince you
-
that humans are, to some extent, natural born essentialists.
-
What I mean by this
-
is we don't just respond to things as we see them,
-
or feel them, or hear them.
-
Rather, our response is conditioned on our beliefs,
-
about what they really are, what they came from,
-
what they're made of, what their hidden nature is.
-
I want to suggest that this is true,
-
not just for how we think about things,
-
but how we react to things.
-
So I want to suggest that pleasure is deep --
-
and that this isn't true
-
just for higher level pleasures like art,
-
but even the most seemingly simple pleasures
-
are affected by our beliefs about hidden essences.
-
So take food.
-
Would you eat this?
-
Well, a good answer is, "It depends. What is it?"
-
Some of you would eat it if it's pork, but not beef.
-
Some of you would eat it if it's beef, but not pork.
-
Few of you would eat it if it's a rat
-
or a human.
-
Some of you would eat it only if it's a strangely colored piece of tofu.
-
That's not so surprising.
-
But what's more interesting
-
is how it tastes to you
-
will depend critically on what you think you're eating.
-
So one demonstration of this was done with young children.
-
How do you make children
-
not just be more likely to eat carrots and drink milk,
-
but to get more pleasure from eating carrots and drinking milk --
-
to think they taste better?
-
It's simple, you tell them they're from McDonald's.
-
They believe McDonald's food is tastier,
-
and it leads them to experience it as tastier.
-
How do you get adults to really enjoy wine?
-
It's very simple:
-
pour it from an expensive bottle.
-
There are now dozens, perhaps hundreds of studies showing
-
that if you believe you're drinking the expensive stuff,
-
it tastes better to you.
-
This was recently done with a neuroscientific twist.
-
They get people into a fMRI scanner,
-
and while they're lying there, through a tube,
-
they get to sip wine.
-
In front of them on a screen is information about the wine.
-
Everybody, of course,
-
drinks exactly the same wine.
-
But if you believe you're drinking expensive stuff,
-
parts of the brain associated with pleasure and reward
-
light up like a Christmas tree.
-
It's not just that you say it's more pleasurable, you say you like it more,
-
you really experience it in a different way.
-
Or take sex.
-
These are stimuli I've used in some of my studies.
-
And if you simply show people these pictures,
-
they'll say these are fairly attractive people.
-
But how attractive you find them,
-
how sexually or romantically moved you are by them,
-
rests critically on who you think you're looking at.
-
You probably think the picture on the left is male,
-
the one on the right is female.
-
If that belief turns out to be mistaken, it will make a difference.
-
(Laughter)
-
It will make a difference if they turn out to be
-
much younger or much older than you think they are.
-
It will make a difference if you were to discover
-
that the person you're looking at with lust
-
is actually a disguised version of your son or daughter,
-
your mother or father.
-
Knowing somebody's your kin typically kills the libido.
-
Maybe one of the most heartening findings
-
from the psychology of pleasure
-
is there's more to looking good than your physical appearance.
-
If you like somebody, they look better to you.
-
This is why spouses in happy marriages
-
tend to think that their husband or wife
-
looks much better than anyone else thinks that they do.
-
(Laughter)
-
A particularly dramatic example of this
-
comes from a neurological disorder known as Capgras syndrome.
-
So Capgras syndrome is a disorder
-
where you get a specific delusion.
-
Sufferers of Capgras syndrome
-
believe that the people they love most in the world
-
have been replaced by perfect duplicates.
-
Now often, a result of Capgras syndrome is tragic.
-
People have murdered those that they loved,
-
believing that they were murdering an imposter.
-
But there's at least one case
-
where Capgras syndrome had a happy ending.
-
This was recorded in 1931.
-
"Research described a woman with Capgras syndrome
-
who complained about her poorly endowed and sexually inadequate lover."
-
But that was before she got Capgras syndrome.
-
After she got it, "She was happy to report
-
that she has discovered that he possessed a double
-
who was rich, virile, handsome and aristocratic."
-
Of course, it was the same man,
-
but she was seeing him in different ways.
-
As a third example,
-
consider consumer products.
-
So one reason why you might like something is its utility.
-
You can put shoes on your feet; you can play golf with golf clubs;
-
and chewed up bubble gum doesn't do anything at all for you.
-
But each of these three objects has value
-
above and beyond what it can do for you
-
based on its history.
-
The golf clubs were owned by John F. Kennedy
-
and sold for three-quarters of a million dollars at auction.
-
The bubble gum was chewed up by pop star Britney Spears
-
and sold for several hundreds of dollars.
-
And in fact, there's a thriving market
-
in the partially eaten food of beloved people.
-
(Laughter)
-
The shoes are perhaps the most valuable of all.
-
According to an unconfirmed report,
-
a Saudi millionaire offered 10 million dollars
-
for this pair of shoes.
-
They were the ones thrown at George Bush
-
at an Iraqi press conference several years ago.
-
(Applause)
-
Now this attraction to objects
-
doesn't just work for celebrity objects.
-
Each one of us, most people,
-
have something in our life that's literally irreplaceable,
-
in that it has value because of its history --
-
maybe your wedding ring, maybe your child's baby shoes --
-
so that if it was lost, you couldn't get it back.
-
You could get something that looked like it or felt like it,
-
but you couldn't get the same object back.
-
With my colleagues George Newman and Gil Diesendruck,
-
we've looked to see what sort of factors, what sort of history, matters
-
for the objects that people like.
-
So in one of our experiments,
-
we asked people to name a famous person who they adored,
-
a living person they adored.
-
So one answer was George Clooney.
-
Then we asked them,
-
"How much would you pay for George Clooney's sweater?"
-
And the answer is a fair amount --
-
more than you would pay for a brand new sweater
-
or a sweater owned by somebody who you didn't adore.
-
Then we asked other groups of subjects --
-
we gave them different restrictions
-
and different conditions.
-
So for instance, we told some people,
-
"Look, you can buy the sweater,
-
but you can't tell anybody you own it,
-
and you can't resell it."
-
That drops the value of it,
-
suggesting that that's one reason why we like it.
-
But what really causes an effect
-
is you tell people, "Look, you could resell it, you could boast about it,
-
but before it gets to you,