Subtitles section Play video
-
I am a palliative care physician
-
and I would like to talk to you today about health care.
-
I'd like to talk to you about the health and care
-
of the most vulnerable population in our country --
-
those people dealing with the most complex serious health issues.
-
I'd like to talk to you about economics as well.
-
And the intersection of these two should scare the hell out of you --
-
it scares the hell out of me.
-
I'd also like to talk to you about palliative medicine:
-
a paradigm of care for this population, grounded in what they value.
-
Patient-centric care based on their values
-
that helps this population live better and longer.
-
It's a care model that tells the truth
-
and engages one-on-one
-
and meets people where they're at.
-
I'd like to start by telling the story of my very first patient.
-
It was my first day as a physician,
-
with the long white coat ...
-
I stumbled into the hospital
-
and right away there's a gentleman, Harold, 68 years old,
-
came to the emergency department.
-
He had had headaches for about six weeks
-
that got worse and worse and worse and worse.
-
Evaluation revealed he had cancer that had spread to his brain.
-
The attending physician directed me to go share with Harold and his family
-
the diagnosis, the prognosis and options of care.
-
Five hours into my new career,
-
I did the only thing I knew how.
-
I walked in,
-
sat down,
-
took Harold's hand,
-
took his wife's hand
-
and just breathed.
-
He said, "It's not good news is it, sonny?"
-
I said, "No."
-
And so we talked and we listened and we shared.
-
And after a while I said,
-
"Harold, what is it that has meaning to you?
-
What is it that you hold sacred?"
-
And he said,
-
"My family."
-
I said, "What do you want to do?"
-
He slapped me on the knee and said, "I want to go fishing."
-
I said, "That, I know how to do."
-
Harold went fishing the next day.
-
He died a week later.
-
As I've gone through my training in my career,
-
I think back to Harold.
-
And I think that this is a conversation
-
that happens far too infrequently.
-
And it's a conversation that had led us to crisis,
-
to the biggest threat to the American way of life today,
-
which is health care expenditures.
-
So what do we know?
-
We know that this population, the most ill,
-
takes up 15 percent of the gross domestic product --
-
nearly 2.3 trillion dollars.
-
So the sickest 15 percent take up 15 percent of the GDP.
-
If we extrapolate this out over the next two decades
-
with the growth of baby boomers,
-
at this rate it is 60 percent of the GDP.
-
Sixty percent of the gross domestic product
-
of the United States of America --
-
it has very little to do with health care at that point.
-
It has to do with a gallon of milk,
-
with college tuition.
-
It has to do with every thing that we value
-
and every thing that we know presently.
-
It has at stake the free-market economy and capitalism
-
of the United States of America.
-
Let's forget all the statistics for a minute, forget the numbers.
-
Let's talk about the value we get for all these dollars we spend.
-
Well, the Dartmouth Atlas, about six years ago,
-
looked at every dollar spent by Medicare --
-
generally this population.
-
We found that those patients who have the highest per capita expenditures
-
had the highest suffering, pain, depression.
-
And, more often than not, they die sooner.
-
How can this be?
-
We live in the United States,
-
it has the greatest health care system on the planet.
-
We spend 10 times more on these patients
-
than the second-leading country in the world.
-
That doesn't make sense.
-
But what we know is,
-
out of the top 50 countries on the planet
-
with organized health care systems,
-
we rank 37th.
-
Former Eastern Bloc countries and sub-Saharan African countries
-
rank higher than us as far as quality and value.
-
Something I experience every day in my practice,
-
and I'm sure, something many of you on your own journeys have experienced:
-
more is not more.
-
Those individuals who had more tests,
-
more bells, more whistles,
-
more chemotherapy, more surgery, more whatever --
-
the more that we do to someone,
-
it decreases the quality of their life.
-
And it shortens it, most often.
-
So what are we going to do about this?
-
What are we doing about this?
-
And why is this so?
-
The grim reality, ladies and gentlemen,
-
is that we, the health care industry -- long white-coat physicians --
-
are stealing from you.
-
Stealing from you the opportunity
-
to choose how you want to live your lives
-
in the context of whatever disease it is.
-
We focus on disease and pathology and surgery
-
and pharmacology.
-
We miss the human being.
-
How can we treat this
-
without understanding this?
-
We do things to this;
-
we need to do things for this.
-
The triple aim of healthcare:
-
one, improve patient experience.
-
Two, improve the population health.
-
Three, decrease per capita expenditure across a continuum.
-
Our group, palliative care,
-
in 2012, working with the sickest of the sick --
-
cancer,
-
heart disease, lung disease,
-
renal disease,
-
dementia --
-
how did we improve patient experience?
-
"I want to be at home, Doc."
-
"OK, we'll bring the care to you."
-
Quality of life, enhanced.
-
Think about the human being.
-
Two: population health.
-
How did we look at this population differently,
-
and engage with them at a different level, a deeper level,
-
and connect to a broader sense of the human condition than my own?
-
How do we manage this group,
-
so that of our outpatient population,
-
94 percent, in 2012, never had to go to the hospital?
-
Not because they couldn't.
-
But they didn't have to.
-
We brought the care to them.
-
We maintained their value, their quality.
-
Number three: per capita expenditures.
-
For this population,
-
that today is 2.3 trillion dollars and in 20 years is 60 percent of the GDP,
-
we reduced health care expenditures by nearly 70 percent.
-
They got more of what they wanted based on their values,
-
lived better and are living longer,
-
for two-thirds less money.
-
While Harold's time was limited,
-
palliative care's is not.
-
Palliative care is a paradigm from diagnosis through the end of life.
-
The hours,
-
weeks, months, years,
-
across a continuum --
-
with treatment, without treatment.
-
Meet Christine.
-
Stage III cervical cancer,
-
so, metastatic cancer that started in her cervix,
-
spread throughout her body.
-
She's in her 50s and she is living.
-
This is not about end of life,
-
this is about life.
-
This is not just about the elderly,
-
this is about people.
-
This is Richard.
-
End-stage lung disease.
-
"Richard, what is it that you hold sacred?"
-
"My kids, my wife and my Harley."
-
(Laughter)
-
"Alright!
-
I can't drive you around on it because I can barely pedal a bicycle,
-
but let's see what we can do."
-
Richard came to me,
-
and he was in rough shape.
-
He had this little voice telling him
-
that maybe his time was weeks to months.
-
And then we just talked.
-
And I listened and tried to hear --
-
big difference.
-
Use these in proportion to this.
-
I said, "Alright, let's take it one day at a time,"
-
like we do in every other chapter of our life.
-
And we have met Richard where Richard's at day-to-day.
-
And it's a phone call or two a week,
-
but he's thriving in the context of end-stage lung disease.
-
Now, palliative medicine is not just for the elderly,
-
it is not just for the middle-aged.
-
It is for everyone.
-
Meet my friend Jonathan.
-
We have the honor and pleasure
-
of Jonathan and his father joining us here today.
-
Jonathan is in his 20s, and I met him several years ago.
-
He was dealing with metastatic testicular cancer,
-
spread to his brain.
-
He had a stroke,
-
he had brain surgery,
-
radiation, chemotherapy.
-
Upon meeting him and his family,
-
he was a couple of weeks away from a bone marrow transplant,
-
and in listening and engaging,
-
they said, "Help us understand -- what is cancer?"
-
How did we get this far
-
without understanding what we're dealing with?
-
How did we get this far without empowering somebody
-
to know what it is they're dealing with,
-
and then taking the next step and engaging in who they are as human beings
-
to know if that is what we should do?
-
Lord knows we can do any kind of thing to you.
-
But should we?
-
And don't take my word for it.
-
All the evidence that is related to palliative care these days
-
demonstrates with absolute certainty people live better and live longer.
-
There was a seminal article out of the New England Journal of Medicine
-
in 2010.
-
A study done at Harvard by friends of mine, colleagues.
-
End-stage lung cancer:
-
one group with palliative care,
-
a similar group without.
-
The group with palliative care reported less pain,
-
less depression.
-
They needed fewer hospitalizations.
-
And, ladies and gentlemen,
-
they lived three to six months longer.
-
If palliative care were a cancer drug,
-
every cancer doctor on the planet would write a prescription for it.
-
Why don't they?
-
Again, because we goofy, long white-coat physicians
-
are trained and of the mantra of dealing with this,
-
not with this.
-
This is a space that we will all come to at some point.
-
But this conversation today is not about dying,
-
it is about living.
-
Living based on our values,
-
what we find sacred
-
and how we want to write the chapters of our lives,
-
whether it's the last
-
or the last five.
-
What we know,
-
what we have proven,
-
is that this conversation needs to happen today --
-
not next week, not next year.
-
What is at stake is our lives today
-
and the lives of us as we get older
-
and the lives of our children and our grandchildren.
-
Not just in that hospital room
-
or on the couch at home,
-
but everywhere we go and everything we see.
-
Palliative medicine is the answer to engage with human beings,
-
to change the journey that we will all face,
-
and change it for the better.
-
To my colleagues,
-
to my patients,
-
to my government,
-
to all human beings,