Subtitles section Play video
-
The police have the suspect dead to rights. They say they've interrogated him for hours,
-
gotten a confession, and ruled out any alibis. They're ready to take the case to the judge.
-
If that's not enough proof for the judge to approve criminal charges,
-
there's the evidence. This is rock-solid proof that they've got the right guy,
-
and there's no jury that would acquit once they've seen the evidence. There's only one problem.
-
The evidence wasn't real. It was planted by the officers.
-
Does this really happen? Do the police plant evidence to get false convictions or to protect
-
themselves from charges? It happens more often than you think, and here are eight of the most
-
shocking cases where the police planted evidence - including one
-
that brought in the federal government to investigate.
-
The first case takes place in rural New Zealand in 1970, when crimes that made the front page
-
were rare. So it shocked the farming community of Lower Waikato when young farm couple Harvey
-
and Jeanette Crew were found brutally murdered on their ranch. Jeanette's father had legal and
-
financial trouble before, and their farm had been plagued by burglaries and arson. They were set to
-
receive her mother's share in the farm shortly, which would make life with their toddler daughter
-
much easier. Then they went missing, and their eighteen-month-old was found alone in her crib.
-
Doctors said the baby had been alone for at least two days and was severely dehydrated.
-
But it would be almost two months before the couple's bodies were found, shot to death.
-
Police immediately zeroed in on a suspect.
-
Arthur Alan Thomas lived on a neighboring farm and it was discovered that his car axle had
-
been used to weigh down Harvey's body. When the police searched the Crewe house again and found
-
a cartridge from Thomas' rifle in the garden, his fate was sealed. He was charged with two counts
-
of murder despite his wife and cousin giving him an alibi. The star witness? Lenard Demler,
-
Jeanette's father who had been forced to sell them his half of the farm. Thomas was
-
convicted twice despite little evidence, with the first conviction being thrown out on appeal.
-
Supporters and investigators quickly began campaigning for a pardon and after nine years,
-
evidence came out that the batch of cartridges the bullet came from couldn't have been from his
-
gun. Thomas was pardoned, and two Detectives were investigated for planting the evidence.
-
While they were both implicated in misconduct, neither was ever charged.
-
But corrupt police don't just plant evidence to solve crimes - they do it to get away with them.
-
It was the footage that outraged a nation in 2015. Many controversial police shootings had taken
-
place over the previous year, but few as shocking as the one that happened in North Charleston,
-
South Carolina. Walter Scott was a forklift operator who had a warrant out for his arrest
-
for missing a child support hearing. Michael Slager was a police officer with several
-
accusations of excessive force against him. When Slager stopped Scott for a broken brake light,
-
he found out about the warrant and moved to arrest him. Scott ran,
-
and the two briefly scuffled. When a taser didn't knock Scott out and he turned to run,
-
Slager pulled out his gun and shot Scott eight times, hitting him fatally in the back.
-
Slager justified his actions by saying that Scott had taken his taser and was a threat.
-
There was just one problem with that.
-
It was the era of cell phones, and the footage of the shooting of Walter Scott
-
was captured by a bystander. Feldin Santana was terrified of being targeted by police,
-
but he shared it with Scott's family, who released it. It showed clearly that Scott
-
had never laid hands on Slager's taser and was shot in the back without provocation.
-
Mass protests came to North Charleston, and Slager was fired and charged with murder.
-
While the first case deadlocked when one juror wouldn't vote to convict, he was charged and
-
pled guilty to federal civil rights charges and is currently doing twenty years in prison.
-
It wasn't the only time police tried to cover up a killing, and the next one went much higher.
-
The year was 1975 in Montgomery, Alabama, and it seemed like an open-and-shut case.
-
Police were searching the neighborhood for a suspect in a grocery store robbery,
-
and they zeroed in on Bernard Whitehurst Jr. When they confronted him, Whitehurst
-
reportedly pulled a gun and aimed it at the officers. They returned fire,
-
killing him with a single bullet to the chest. The shooting was quickly deemed justified when
-
a gun was found at the scene, there was no autopsy, and Whitehurst was quickly
-
buried. It seemed like an open-and-shut case like so many other police shootings.
-
It wasn't, and six months later the entire case started to unravel.
-
The Montgomery Advisor was one of the only newspapers to cover the case extensively
-
and allege that the gun was planted, and many locals were starting to question the events.
-
The police alleged that the paper was making up stories, and their publisher even agreed to take
-
a polygraph test. Three Montgomery officers were eventually charged with perjury over the
-
planted gun, and offered a chance to take a polygraph test to prove their innocence.
-
They all resigned from the force instead. While no one was ever charged in the shooting and no one is
-
exactly sure what happened in the moments that led to Bernard Whitehurst Jr.'s death, the conspiracy
-
led to the resignation of eight officers and several Montgomery officials including the Mayor.
-
There's a third type of planted evidence. Instead of trying to solve or cover up crimes,
-
this officer tried to create them.
-
For those who were stopped by Deputy Zachary Wester in Florida,
-
a traffic stop quickly turned to horror. He would pull them over, question them,
-
and then make up a reason to search the car. He would quickly find drugs, usually meth,
-
and make a quick arrest. The people would go into the system and many saw jail time or lost jobs or
-
custody of their children. Over several years, Wester seemed to have an uncanny ability to stop
-
cars whose drivers were carrying small amounts of drugs. This was a great asset for a policeman,
-
and anyone who watched him work was sure he was headed for a promotion soon.
-
It was all a lie.
-
Zachary Wester was planting the drugs on unsuspecting people, and footage shows them
-
react with shock and horror when it's pulled out seemingly from thin air. While only eleven victims
-
were initially found, prosecutors dropped over a hundred cases involving Wester and were reviewing
-
over two hundred. Eight people were released from prison and Wester was charged with racketeering,
-
false imprisonment, official misconduct, and a host of other charges. Prosecutors were showing
-
no mercy, and Wester wasn't offered a plea deal. He's currently awaiting trial and could face over
-
thirty years in prison if convicted - and he's probably lucky his victims were already released.
-
The next case set a record the Government wasn't happy about.
-
It was one of the most shocking crimes in the history of Waukegan, Illinois. In August 1992,
-
a woman called police and reported that her home had been broken into
-
and her children's 11-year-old babysitter, Holly Slaker, was missing. When police arrived,
-
they found the girl's body in the house, stabbed to death. Evidence of rape was found,
-
samples were taken, and a massive manhunt began. A prison informant fingered a fellow inmate,
-
Puerto Rico-born Juan Rivera. Rivera cooperated with the investigation and gave samples of his
-
blood and DNA. While no physical evidence was found on site linking him to the crime,
-
Rivera was held in custody where his mental condition began to deteriorate.
-
His long nightmare was only beginning.
-
Rivera was interrogated until he confessed, even though many Detectives stated his comments were
-
inconsistent with the crime scene. He was quickly charged with first-degree murder and convicted,
-
despite evidence from his electronic ankle monitor showing that he hadn't
-
left the home on the night of the murder. While his first conviction was overturned,
-
his fate was sealed at his second trial by the testimony of the child being babysat- who was only
-
two at the time. It wasn't until 2004 when DNA testing cast doubt on his guilt that he
-
saw the chance at freedom - but prosecutors were determined to try him again. They had a
-
bizarre theory that he could have still been guilty due to cross-contamination and even
-
claimed that Slaker had been sexually active, contaminating the crime scene.
-
Shockingly, Rivera was convicted again and all hope seemed lost.
-
It was 2011 when the courts issued a scathing condemnation of the initial trial,
-
pointing out all the flaws. Not only did they overturn Rivera's conviction,
-
but they barred the prosecution from trying him again. The prosecution had even
-
tried to enter shoes as evidence that weren't available for sale at the time of the murder.
-
The many legal flaws and lies in the proceedings led to Rivera winning the biggest settlement
-
for wrongful conviction in United States history at the time - twenty million dollars.
-
The next case's criminal cop didn't commit his crimes alone.
-
Sgt. Wayne Jenkins was a prominent officer in the Baltimore Police Department,
-
the head of the Gun Trace Task Force. So when one of his suspects wound up dead, run over by
-
Jenkins' car while being arrested, most officers gave him the benefit of the doubt. He claimed
-
that the suspect had pointed a gun at the car, which turned out to be a BB gun, and that gave
-
him the authority to take out the suspect by any means necessary. But all of this started falling
-
apart when Jenkins was arrested and convicted for a host of crimes committed using his position of
-
power including robberies and dealing drugs. All his past cases started being investigated.
-
And the truth about the incident with his car was blown wide open.
-
Not only did the suspect not have a gun on him, but Jenkins didn't act alone.
-
He called up two other officers, Keith Gladstone and Carmine Vignola,
-
and asked them to bring a gun from their own car to the scene. The two officers
-
worked together to stage the crime scene. When federal investigators looked into the case as
-
part of a massive scandal involving Jenkins' task force, the two officers were exposed and wound
-
up receiving prison sentences. As for Jenkins, he was headed for a twenty-five year stay in prison,
-
where many of the people he had convicted were likely not so happy to see him.
-
The truth usually comes to light - but sometimes it's too late.
-
It was 1940 in County Tipperary, Ireland,
-
and the central-Irish town was about to be rocked by a shocking murder. Mary McCarthy,
-
also known as Moll, was an unmarried woman with seven children by six fathers who made a living
-
off sex work. Her controversial profession led to her home being targeted for arson,
-
but everyone was still shocked when she turned up dead, found with two gunshot wounds to her head
-
delivered by the nephew of her landlord. Harry Gleeson was suspected of being the father of her
-
youngest child, and suspicion soon fell on him. He claimed innocence, but he was quickly charged and
-
convicted. Justice was swift in those days, and Gleeson was hung only six months after the murder.
-
That was far from the end of the story.
-
Sean McBride, Gleeson's lawyer, didn't give up the fight after his client was executed.
-
Decades later, a friend of Gleeson's put together a book detailing all the flaws in the case.
-
Among them, the murder happened on a date when Gleeson had an alibi, the landlord wasn't called
-
as a witness, and the local Garda engineered a false confrontation between Gleeson and two
-
of McCarthy's children. They had even failed to enter the local shotgun register into evidence,
-
which could have helped Gleeson's case. The suppression of the register and the
-
alibi was enough, and the President of Ireland issued a posthumous pardon to Gleeson in 2013.
-
The next case nearly took down an entire major police department.
-
New York State Trooper David L. Harding was an ambitious man, and he was looking to move up
-
to the CIA. When he was asked in an interview if he was willing to break the law for his country,
-
he didn't wait - he answered yes and proudly announced that he had fabricated evidence
-
to convict people he knew were guilty as an officer. The CIA wasn't pleased.
-
They notified the Justice Department and an investigation began - and what
-
they found was shocking. In Central New York, a massive conspiracy of fraudulent
-
convictions and falsified evidence had been taking place for years.
-
It had even ruined people's lives.
-
Two false murder convictions were quickly uncovered. One man, John Spencer, had been booked
-
into a police precinct. The police then lifted his fingerprints off surfaces in the precinct
-
and attached them to evidence cards, using that to convict him of murder. Another suspect,
-
Shirley Kinge, was convicted of burglary and arson in a horrible quadruple-murder case
-
that her son was implicated in. While she did possess a stolen credit card from the home,
-
the evidence against her was mainly falsified fingerprints. Not only did what came to be known
-
as the New York Police Troop C Scandal lead to five officers being charged and three convicted,
-
but every conviction involving the unit had to be reinvestigated.
-
For more on shocking police behavior, check out “Weird Times Police Arrested Kids”,
-
or watch “This Happens to Drugs Confiscated By Police” for an in-depth look at the system.