Subtitles section Play video
-
- [Kelly] On Wednesday, lawmakers squared off
-
with the chief executives of the tech industries
-
four most powerful players,
-
Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Apple's Tim Cook,
-
Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, and Google Sundar Pichai.
-
Since last June, the house judiciary committee
-
has been engaged in a sweeping investigation
-
of each of the four companies,
-
honing in on how they stifle competition
-
in the tech industry.
-
These companies have been consolidating power
-
for a long time,
-
and now, Congress is getting ready to do something about it.
-
- Open markets are predicated on the idea
-
that if a company harms people, consumers, workers,
-
and business partners will choose another option.
-
We're here today because that choice is no longer possible.
-
The purpose of today's hearing
-
is to examine the dominance of Amazon,
-
Apple, Facebook and Google.
-
- [Kelly] For years,
-
antitrust experts have been building the case
-
against big techs questionable acquisitions,
-
predatory pricing, and copycat behaviors.
-
The CEO's had to face those arguments head-on on Wednesday.
-
- Amazon runs the largest online marketplace in America,
-
capturing 70% of all online marketplace sales.
-
Despite a litany of privacy scandals
-
and record-breaking fines,
-
Facebook continues to enjoy booming profits,
-
$18 billion last year alone.
-
Google is the world's largest online search engine,
-
capturing more than 90% of searches online.
-
- [Kelly] These are four very different companies,
-
but the committee use Wednesday's hearing
-
to show how similar they were
-
when responding to competitors.
-
In particular, the committee looked at how
-
each company controls distribution,
-
surveys nascent companies,
-
and how they use their market dominance
-
to suppress competition.
-
- We used to have a policy that restricted competitors
-
from using our platform.
-
- Okay Mr. Zuckerberg, these examples
-
and supporting documents strongly suggests
-
that Facebook does weaponize its policy
-
to undermine competitors.
-
- Is it true that Amazon refers to third party sellers
-
as internal competitors?
-
- We've interviewed many small businesses
-
and they use the words like bullying, fear and panic
-
to describe their relationship with Amazon.
-
- That's an enormous amount of power.
-
- [Kelly] The committee argued that companies
-
like Facebook and Google
-
control how information is disseminated.
-
The same goes for Apple and Amazon,
-
but when it comes to their app stores and marketplaces.
-
- Apple is the sole decision maker
-
as to whether an app is made available to app users
-
through the Apple store.
-
Isn't that correct?
-
- If it's a native app? Yes, sir.
-
If it's a weapon, no.
-
- Throughout our investigation,
-
we've heard concerns that rules governing
-
the app store review process
-
are not available to the app developers.
-
The rules are made up as you go.
-
They are upper trevally interpreted and enforced,
-
and are subject to change whenever Apple sees fit to change.
-
And developers have no choice,
-
but to go along with the changes
-
or they must leave the app store.
-
That's an enormous amount of power.
-
Mr. Cook, does Apple not treat all app developers equally?
-
- Sir, we treat every developer the same,
-
because we care so deeply about privacy
-
and security and quality.
-
We do look at every app before it goes on,
-
but those rules apply evenly to everyone.
-
- [Kelly] Surveillance is key
-
to the committee's investigation.
-
Throughout the hearing, lawmakers argue that
-
each company has used its dominance in the tech industry
-
to keep a watchful eye on their competitors.
-
Google face tough questions from lawmakers
-
who fear that its dominance in search
-
allows it to monitor the web traffic of competitors.
-
This information could result in the company
-
ranking competitors lower in search results.
-
- In 2010, Google stole restaurant reviews from Yelp
-
to bootstrap its own rival local search business.
-
- Mr. Pichai, do you know how Google responded
-
when Yelp asked you to stop stealing their reviews?
-
Well, I'll tell you,
-
our investigation shows that Google's response
-
was to threaten to delist Yelp entirely.
-
In other words, the choice Google gave you up was,
-
let us steal your content
-
or effectively disappear from the web.
-
Mr. Pichai, isn't that anti-competitive?
-
- Congressmen, you know, when I run the company,
-
I'm really focused on giving users what they want.
-
We conduct ourselves to the highest standard,
-
happy to engage, understand the specifics
-
and answer your questions further.
-
- [Kelly] You can make the same argument
-
for Facebook buying Instagram,
-
Amazon buying Ring,
-
or Apple using the app store to fend off competing software.
-
Has Facebook ever threatened
-
to clone the products of another company
-
while also attempting to acquire that company?
-
- Congresswoman, not that I would recall.
-
- And I'd like to just remind you that you are under oath
-
and there are quotes from Facebook's own documents.
-
Prior to acquiring Instagram,
-
Facebook began developing a similar product called
-
Facebook Camera, correct?
-
- Congresswoman, that's correct.
-
- Did you ever use this very similar Facebook camera product
-
to threaten Instagram's founder, Kevin Systrom?
-
- Congresswoman, I'm not sure
-
what you would mean by threatened.
-
I think it was public that we were building a camera app
-
at the time, that was a well-documented thing.
-
- In a chat you told Mr. Systrom that Facebook was
-
"Developing our own photo strategy.
-
So, how we engage now will also determine
-
how much we're partners versus competitors down the line."
-
Instagram's founders seem to think that was a threat.
-
He confided in an investor at the time
-
that he feared you would go into
-
"Destroy mode" if he didn't sell Instagram to you.
-
- Congresswoman, I wanna respectfully disagree
-
with the characterization.
-
I think it was that this was a space
-
that we were going to compete in one way or another.
-
I don't view those conversations as a threat in any way.
-
- I'm just using the documents
-
and the testimony that the committee
-
has collected from others.
-
Did you warn Evan Spiegel, the founder of Snapchat,
-
that Facebook was in the process of cloning
-
the features of his company,
-
while also attempting to buy Snapchat?
-
- Congresswoman, I don't remember
-
those specific conversations,
-
but that was also an area where it was very clear
-
that we were going to be building something.
-
- [Kelly] Finally, the committee honed in
-
on how each platform allegedly abuses its control
-
over current technologies
-
to strengthen their market dominance.
-
Lawmakers argued that through self preferencing
-
and predatory pricing,
-
these platforms have made it difficult
-
for small businesses and competitors to succeed.
-
And in one case we heard from one Amazon bookseller
-
who was blocked by selling books for no apparent reason.
-
- We were a top book seller on Amazon.com,
-
and we worked day-and-night very hard
-
towards growing our business
-
and maintaining a five-star feedback rating.
-
Most importantly, this business feeds a total of 14 people.
-
And as we grew, we were shrinking Amazon's market share
-
in the textbooks category.
-
So now, in retaliation
-
Amazon started restricting us from selling.
-
They started with a few titles in early 2019,
-
and within six months,
-
Amazon systematically blocked us
-
from selling the full textbook category.
-
We haven't sold a single book from the past 10 months,
-
or probably more.
-
We were never given a reason.
-
Amazon didn't even provide us with a notice
-
as to why we were being restricted.
-
There was no warning. There was no plan.
-
- She told us that they sent
-
more than 500 separate communications to Amazon,
-
including to you Mr. Bezos, over the past year.
-
There was not a single meaningful response.
-
Do you think this is an acceptable way
-
to treat someone that you described
-
as both a partner and customer?
-
- No, congresswoman. And I would like to talk to her.
-
It does not at all to me
-
seem like the right way to treat her.
-
- [Kelly] Wednesday's hearing
-
was really just the beginning.
-
In a few weeks, the committee will publish a final report,
-
detailing how large tech firms
-
allegedly violate antitrust laws,
-
and what they can do to fix these problems.
-
By this fall, Chairman Ciciline and company
-
will release that report, and the real work will begin.
-
Thinking about how Congress
-
wants to regulate these companies,
-
or if any of them should be broken up.
-
- We need to ensure the antitrust laws first written
-
more than a century go work in the digital age.
-
When these laws were written in Minneapolis
-
were men named Rockefeller and Carnegie.
-
Their controls in marketplace allowed them to do
-
whatever it took to crush independent businesses
-
and expand their own power.
-
The names have changed, but the story is the same.
-
And without objection, this hearing is adjourned.